Direct answer: automate execution, not release authority
A long-lived coding agent should receive a bounded goal, an approved operating playbook, observable checkpoints and a named human release owner. Cursor says its cloud agents can respond to events, retain an objective through a long-running session and receive steering without being interrupted mid-action. It also says cloud agents can monitor pull requests, watch a Slack thread or run scheduled tasks. These are useful execution capabilities, but they do not establish that a change is correct, secure or ready for production.
CreatikLab’s operational interpretation is therefore simple: let the agent continue routine work, but require evidence before a human accepts the result. The acceptance package should contain the original goal, repository and environment identifiers, changed files, test results, unresolved warnings, relevant review comments and the exact revision proposed for release. An agent reporting completion is a workflow event, not proof of business acceptance.
